[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |
E_INVARG
is raised. If the programmer does not have read
permission on object, then E_PERM
is raised.
Most of the remaining operations on verbs accept a string containing the verb's
name to identify the verb in question. Because verbs can have multiple names
and because an object can have multiple verbs with the same name, this practice
can lead to difficulties. To most unambiguously refer to a particular verb,
one can instead use a positive integer, the index of the verb in the list
returned by verbs()
, described above.
For example, suppose that verbs(#34)
returns this list:
{"foo", "bar", "baz", "foo"} |
Object #34
has two verbs named `foo' defined on it (this may not be
an error, if the two verbs have different command syntaxes). To refer
unambiguously to the first one in the list, one uses the integer 1; to refer to
the other one, one uses 4.
In the function descriptions below, an argument named verb-desc is either
a string containing the name of a verb or else a positive integer giving the
index of that verb in its defining object's verbs()
list.
For historical reasons, there is also a second, inferior mechanism for referring to verbs with numbers, but its use is strongly discouraged. If the property$server_options.support_numeric_verbname_strings
exists with a true value, then functions on verbs will also accept a numeric string (e.g.,"4"
) as a verb descriptor. The decimal integer in the string works more-or-less like the positive integers described above, but with two significant differences:
- The numeric string is a zero-based index into
verbs()
; that is, in the string case, you would use the number one less than what you would use in the positive integer case.
- When there exists a verb whose actual name looks like a decimal integer, this numeric-string notation is ambiguous; the server will in all cases assume that the reference is to the first verb in the list for which the given string could be a name, either in the normal sense or as a numeric index.
Clearly, this older mechanism is more difficult and risky to use; new code should only be written to use the current mechanism, and old code using numeric strings should be modified not to do so.
E_INVARG
is raised. If object
does not define a verb as specified by verb-desc, then E_VERBNF
is
raised. If the programmer does not have read (write) permission on the verb in
question, then verb_info()
(set_verb_info()
) raises
E_PERM
. Verb info has the following form:
{owner, perms, names} |
where owner is an object, perms is a string containing only
characters from the set `r', `w', `x', and `d', and
names is a string. This is the kind of value returned by
verb_info()
and expected as the third argument to
set_verb_info()
. set_verb_info()
raises E_INVARG
if
owner is not valid, if perms contains any illegal characters, or if
names is the empty string or consists entirely of spaces; it raises
E_PERM
if owner is not the programmer and the programmer is not a
wizard.
E_INVARG
is raised. If object does not define a verb as specified by
verb-desc, then E_VERBNF
is raised. If the programmer does not
have read (write) permission on the verb in question, then verb_args()
(set_verb_args()
) raises E_PERM
. Verb args specifications have
the following form:
{dobj, prep, iobj} |
where dobj and iobj are strings drawn from the set "this"
,
"none"
, and "any"
, and prep is a string that is either
"none"
, "any"
, or one of the prepositional phrases listed much
earlier in the description of verbs in the first chapter. This is the kind of
value returned by verb_args()
and expected as the third argument to
set_verb_args()
. Note that for set_verb_args()
, prep must
be only one of the prepositional phrases, not (as is shown in that table) a set
of such phrases separated by `/' characters. set_verb_args
raises
E_INVARG
if any of the dobj, prep, or iobj strings is
illegal.
verb_args($container, "take") => {"any", "out of/from inside/from", "this"} set_verb_args($container, "take", {"any", "from", "this"}) |
verb_info()
, described above. The new verb's direct-object,
preposition, and indirect-object specifications are given by args in the
same format as is returned by verb_args
, described above. The new verb
initially has the empty program associated with it; this program does nothing
but return an unspecified value.
If object is not valid, or info does not specify a valid owner and
well-formed permission bits and verb names, or args is not a legitimate
syntax specification, then E_INVARG
is raised. If the programmer does
not have write permission on object or if the owner specified by
info is not the programmer and the programmer is not a wizard, then
E_PERM
is raised.
E_INVARG
is raised. If the
programmer does not have write permission on object, then E_PERM
is raised. If object does not define a verb as specified by
verb-desc, then E_VERBNF
is raised.
verb_code()
and expected as the third argument
to set_verb_code()
. For verb_code()
, the expressions in the
returned code are usually written with the minimum-necessary parenthesization;
if full-paren is true, then all expressions are fully parenthesized.
Also for verb_code()
, the lines in the returned code are usually not
indented at all; if indent is true, each line is indented to better show
the nesting of statements.
If object is not valid, then E_INVARG
is raised. If object
does not define a verb as specified by verb-desc, then E_VERBNF
is
raised. If the programmer does not have read (write) permission on the verb in
question, then verb_code()
(set_verb_code()
) raises
E_PERM
. If the programmer is not, in fact. a programmer, then
E_PERM
is raised.
For set_verb_code()
, the result is a list of strings, the error messages
generated by the MOO-code compiler during processing of code. If the
list is non-empty, then set_verb_code()
did not install code; the
program associated with the verb in question is unchanged.
disassemble()
interesting to peruse as a way to gain a deeper appreciation of how the server
works.
If object is not valid, then E_INVARG
is raised. If object
does not define a verb as specified by verb-desc, then E_VERBNF
is
raised. If the programmer does not have read permission on the verb in
question, then disassemble()
raises E_PERM
.
[ < ] | [ > ] | [ << ] | [ Up ] | [ >> ] | [Top] | [Contents] | [Index] | [ ? ] |